Faites corriger et relire vos documents en anglais par un natif.
Votre correcteur éliminera les erreurs directement dans le texte et suggérera des améliorations.
Votre éditeur corrigera les erreurs de langue et de compréhension directement dans le texte via Track Changes. Il proposera également des modifications supplémentaires dans les commentaires.
Consultez un exemple de mémoire en anglais corrigé ci-dessous et téléchargez le fichier complet ici.
I observed aA striking resemblance has been seenbetween the success rates of the Netherlands and that ofthe US. In the study byMartynova and Renneboog (2010)it already became clear found that shareholder protection was almost equal between the US and the Netherlandsin both countries. This correspondedcorresponds to the fact that they both have a success rate is of approximately the 40%.
At least oneMore than 1 hedge fund acquired a share in 14the company in fourteen of the 36 listed companies in my database. Of these, 10 of thosewere working together to achieve certain goals. The hedge funds held a share in the company for an average length of hedge funds holding a share in the company is531 days. Although Brav et al. (2008) consideredmay find this long-term period, I consider 531 days is still to be seen as to be short-term.
The average percentage of voting power is initial ranges between 8.06% and the maximum voting power is 10.10%. From By looking at this data, it can be concluded that hedge funds are not generally involved in acquiring controlling blocks of stock.
Due to the fact that Because shareholders have an opportunity to go to the OK, they have a fair reasonable chance of getting having their demands fulfilled. The OK likes prefers to solve disputes between shareholders and management by taking enacting provisional measures that improve the dialogue between the two parties. As a consequence, the parties often find compromises. Defensive measures that are taken by the management takes only to oppress shareholders are prohibited, and minority shareholders can change how they are treated by if a majority files an appeal.
Discussion
Conducting Doing an extensively study of the shareholder activism undertaken by hedge funds in the Netherlands over a for the past decade required a great deal of precise work. But although Even though I didn’t not use any private information, this study pretty nice gives a provides insight into hedge fund activism in the country.
Exemple de commentaire sur des fautes en anglais :
« Since you indicated that personal pronouns can be used in your thesis, consider using the active voice here. This is a simple way to make your writing clearer and more compelling. You can read more about the active voice here: https://www.scribbr.com/academic-writing/prefer-active-passive-sentence-constructions/. »
Exemple de conseil sur le sens des phrases dans un document en anglais :
« The extent to which this is an obvious consequence of the information you’ve provided is not entirely clear. Please make this relationship more apparent. Reviewing your linking word choices may help you here. »
Exemple de conseil sur l’amélioration du style en anglais :
« This is an example of an inflated phrase. Learn how to recognize such phrases and tighten your writing here: https://www.scribbr.com/academic-writing/write-shorter-sentences-clarify-dissertation/. »
Exemple de commentaire sur la structure du développement en anglais :
« Please ensure that your discussion section meets all the requirements included in this checklist. In particular, you have not yet discussed the study limitations: https://www.scribbr.com/thesis/writing-conclusion-discussion-thesis/#what-does-the-discussion-look-like. »
Avec votre document corrigé, vous recevrez un message de votre correcteur avec des conseils pour corriger vos erreurs les plus fréquentes en anglais.
Notre objectif est de vous aider à devenir un meilleur écrivain, même dans la langue de Shakespeare.
Sarah
Correctrice anglaise de Scribbr
Dear Casper,
Thanks for sending your thesis to Scribbr! Sustainability is an important issue these days, and you’ve done a good job of making a complex topic accessible and engaging.
Overall, your writing is clear, so I’ve focused on bringing the style and tone in line with academic standards. Many small inconsistencies have been corrected, and I’ve made your sentences more concise where appropriate. In the Most Common Mistakes overview, I’ve shared some academic writing tips to help you address these issues in the future.
To answer your question, I’m confident that your literature review chapter could be understood by a reader with little knowledge on the topic. That said, there are a few areas where additional context could be helpful. See my specific suggestions in the comments and checklists.
I hope that this feedback is helpful to you as you revise your thesis. Best of luck finishing up the project!
Cheers,
Sarah
Language / Grammar / Capitalization
The names of theories, models, disciplines and ideas should generally not take capital letters.
Despite what the Utility Maximization Model utility maximization model suggests, people do not always act in their own self-interest—a significant finding in Behavioral Economics behavioral economics.
Language / Punctuation / Apostrophes
Apostrophes should not be used to make plurals. This also applies to abbreviations, acronyms and decades.
The six NGO’s NGOs were especially active in the 1970’s 1970s.
Academic style / Word choice / Tone
Academic writing is generally more formal than other kinds of writing—avoid casual, everyday language and slang.
A lot of Many studies have tried to find out determine why we remember certain photos photographs but not others.
Academic style / Word choice / Repetition and redundancy
Good academic writing is concise—it doesn’t use more words than necessary to make a point. If one or two words can take the place of several, choose the shorter option.
In the year of 2018, the researchers interviewed a total of 75 individuals in order to better understand the concept of platform-based work.
Vous recevrez un rapport sur vos erreurs linguistiques fréquentes en anglais, pour les comprendre et les éliminer.
Nous vérifions la mise en page et structure de votre document ainsi que sa clarté. Votre correcteur suivra les listes de vérification appropriées et vous fournira des conseils dans des commentaires.
Abstract AddConsider writing an abstract to give readers a concise summary of your research and to help potential readers to decide whether to read the full paper. |
Abstract: Relevance of the research AddMake sure the abstract clearly outlines why your research is necessary and/or what gap in the literature you’re seeking to address. Since you’re an expert on this topic, its relevance might seem obvious to you, but remember that it’s important to spell things out explicitly for readers so that they can follow along. |
Literature review: Transitions between sections ReviseConsider introducing transitions to bridge the individual paragraphs of your document. This approach will make it easier for the reader to grasp how each new paragraph fits into your discussion, which will make your writing more cohesive (and therefore more compelling) overall. |
Results: Mention of methods RemoveAfter a brief introduction to the chapter, it’s best to jump right into presenting the results themselves. In most cases, there is no need to re-review the methods or other elements of the research in the results chapter. |
Discussion: Interpretation of results AddThe discussion is the place to interpret the results. In this section, you might consider whether and how the results support the literature, address the implications of the results, and generally explore the contribution of the research in more detail. |
Conclusion ShortenA conclusion section is usually relatively short and to the point. It seems like you may have included some unnecessary details in this section. I’d therefore recommend revising this section with an eye on making sure you’re providing information that is relevant and important. |
Vous voulez nous contacter directement ? Pas de problème, nous sommes là pour vous.
Notre équipe vous aide à obtenir votre diplôme en vous offrant :
Le générateur de sources Scribbr est développé en utilisant le projet open-source Citation Style Language (CSL) et le citeproc-js de Frank Bennett. Il s’agit de la même technologie utilisée par des dizaines d’autres outils de citation populaires, notamment Mendeley et Zotero.
Vous pouvez trouver tous les styles de citation et les paramètres utilisés dans le générateur de sources Scribbr dans notre dépôt accessible au public sur Github.
Le logiciel anti-plagiat de Scribbr utilise une technologie avancée de détection du plagiat similaire au logiciel utilisé par la plupart des universités et des éditeurs, ce qui garantit que vous obtiendrez des résultats identiques ou très similaires.
Le détecteur d’IA complémentaire est alimenté par un logiciel qui appartient à Scribbr et qui est capable de détecter des textes générés par ChatGPT, Perplexity et d’autres outils d’IA générative avec une grande précision.
Scribbr se spécialise dans la relecture et correction de documents académiques (liés aux études). Nous corrigeons les :